I used to get in. We're good.
We're live on Twix.
We're live on YouTube and I believe we're about to go live over on the SportsCastr.
There we are, Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, welcome back to the channel.
We are on a live stream right now for the XFL week to There's a good chance, as I imagine 70 women at that high.
But 50 to 70% of the people will watch this on the replay recording 10 a.
East Coast time A little less than four hours before lock.
Gonna wait for some people to get in here.
But I will point out at the beginning of this as you go along and you watch it, it's gonna be very Q and a based on my interests are labeled that they're not depicted in ranking or tear order.
That is over on, Patron, if you were interested at about 100 people, sign up for page on.
Welcome to the community In the discord, I posted a podcast this morning going position by position, game by game, even in a way going very in depth.
What's going on? Crimson type.
Welcome into the YouTube chap going very in depth into what I am going to be doing today.
Um, some line of construction discussions, really at the end of the day or rankings and two years is out there on Patron for Expel priority and whole fame members.
The podcast is for anybody in all sports.
All that is uploaded right now, as well as the sheets that will depict where my interests lie and then the rankings in tears over in Patron.
So that's the questions if anybody has them more in depth information.
The tears went out yesterday have been updated throughout all of yesterday, finishing touches early this morning.
Podcast went out early this morning as well.
Thanks for all you do, says Rob Rob, what's going on? Everybody? Kevin, what's up, Gilbert, How you doing? Everybody welcome, and I'll give a couple minutes for people to happen.
Feel free to ask whatever questions that you have.
I guess the only question is that I won't specifically answer are when people say, Who are your top three running backs, where your top three wide receivers who's your top quarterback? Because on a sport where there's only four games and eight teams that stuff is going to be more Patriot focused.
I am fine talking about injuries and how those affected slates.
Overall theory about the XFL players who I think are finding it will go through position by position, and you'll see when it comes to like ranking players out.
I'll probably avoid those questions in just point people towards page on, because at this point there's a few 100 people over there.
I'm using that information so I don't still stay secure for that, Geremi asks.
What is the XFL is the extreme Football League.
It is relaunched second week.
They did a lot of great things in Week one.
I am very curious to see what the interest is weak, too, if we're going anywhere off of YouTube interest Week one.
I think I had most of my videos around 5000 views this week.
They're gonna come in probably around 3000 or so.
So about a 40% drop off if they lose about a 40% dropoff in viewership for the XFL.
That's a good thing.
It says that's obviously not a good thing.
I know it's I don't know what their projections are moving forward.
I'm really looked, but it's bound to drop off.
You don't have a huge marketing lead up in people curious of what to expect and people then not go.
And I don't really care too much about what I just washed right, so it's bound to drop off.
It's just a matter of how much because however much it drops off will be how much these price falls on draftkings drop off.
Which means how much interest goes down.
So it'll be interesting to see.
Is Thompkins good for my captain? I'm trusting you.
Okay, so here's the biggest news.
I have no interest in the 100.
Tompkins Hey is listed now is the backup.
After his foot injury, he went from being listed as it started to a backup.
You do not just consciously make Rashad Ross to the starter over the under Thompkins if you don't plan on doing it that way.
Like if you were to say it's going to be split Tompkins and Rashad Ross and you just leave Daniel Tompkins is the one on your depth chart.
They made a conscious effort in D.
To say, you know what we're gonna put a shot, Ross ahead of you or shot.
Ross needed to get more snaps last week.
Learn the offense.
He had 21 routes from, Um I think he could even stay in that same area and routes run and time consuming worked in.
But now that it looks like Tomkins is going to operate as the at best third wide receiver, likely rotating in with Rashad Ross and maybe do pre to an extent, I don't really have much interest in DeAndre Tompkins anymore, and you'll see that as we go through.
So I guess that's the biggest thing you can see right here. Dr.
Thompkins is probably with a foot.
Listen, is a backup on the depth chart.
I would not want to play him in my captain spot.
I would even really be weary of raw string him at all at this point.
What's going on? Jeremiah? Uh, what's going on? Marley? What's up, everybody? Yeah, football, says Jeremiah.
I guess. I mean, they're not correlated at all.
The only the only correlation between WW the XFL is Vince McMahon.
Is a publicly owned company, was a publicly traded company Ah, the XFL is private under a different umbrella, completely, so it's literally just the owners of the same and not much more after that.
The owner being Vince McMahon, too.
All right, So any interesting camera is pain.
Hard to have too much interest.
I don't really want to be Ross during that many running backs in my line ups.
He's in a backfield that has four running backs by committee.
Ellie See ran a good amount of routes, but a lot of the upside out of all four.
Little running Max probably came from the fact that felt Nelson targeted running backs 15 or 16 times last week only threw downfield twice.
It's really hard to like.
Cameras are in pain this week.
Even if you're trying to get sneaky, his price point is still up there now. Much interest.
I should have building a lineup in XFL after doing some research, and I'm sorry at this time. I can't do XFL.
It's like W N B A.
At best, it well, First of all, the price falls Airway larger than W M I. A.
But similar to WN BA and WNBA is getting a little bit more efficient because there's more content.
I covered W b the last year.
Um, if you cover the XFL and you, you you take action in the theories that you're presenting early on.
Yes, there's going to be some content out there.
Mine is one of the only free resource is video and podcast lies related specifically to the F s.
And there's a lot of articles. Great work.
I've seen there some stuffy and pay walls.
I'm sure it's great work, but if you're covering or you're trying to build XFL on your own and the research you're going to do is a lot.
Before the season started, I'd probably put in easily 100 hours of research into the weak one slight, if not more between depth charge between the draft, following it all the way, then in the summer, just tentatively.
So, yeah, if you're trying to build liners like this morning with yourself and just doing some research and looking at game of, you're gonna probably I have a really difficult time.
If you are a patron of mine.
If your subscriber to another website, if you're following a lot of content and you're following these games and have access to data.
Resource is, yeah, you probably have an idea of what's going on today and really be able to identify where underprice guys are, where some flunky performances were last week and really, what these teams are all about and what they want to do.
Which teams look a little bit ***ie last week.
I can name 1 to 2.
Which teams that looked great are probably still going to look great, like a name 1 to 2.
So I think you could have a better idea.
I don't think it's like the WN ba um in overall context, It all the price schools.
The stakes are much, much higher, and it's also a lot more news and reporting the WNBA's marketing.
They should hire whoever the executives of marketing are the XFL because their marketing is absolutely horrendous.
I've been trying to reach out for them for a year to help with market because I actually think the support of the W.
W is a fine sport.
But the marketing is horrendous.
The expels has been fantastic, and that's what just hurts.
The WNBA's overall upside price falls will stay smaller.
says, Let the pigs keep coming.
Who's gonna start for L.
So, yes, this is Josh Johnson is tentatively expected to start for L. A. But officially listed. Questionable.
If he doesn't start, all hell breaks loose because it's probably Jalen McClendon.
And he looked terrible in four pass attempts last week.
Chad are trust in office is not going to play this week.
He's already listed out S o.
I'm hoping Josh Johnson starts.
The big issue with this lead is if Josh Johnson doesn't start.
I'm expecting a lot of people to one's own Nelson Spruce.
That makes a lot of sense.
Led the entire league by, like, five targets last week with 15 he looked great.
He's going to have a different court back either way, throwing them the ball this week.
If it's Josh Johnson, you feel confident they probably could have saved black knowledge Remake rights.
Screw should still be the guy, but it's jail.
McClendon, playing a $10,400 Nelson's Bruce, is extremely scary second most expensive player on the slate, second only to quarterback filled Walker.
And then, at that point, it's on Sundays.
So you already missed out on potentially pivoting to McCall McKay, who's $200 less.
Eli Rogers is a few $100 less, right, so this slate gets sketchy for a lot of people.
If Josh Johnson doesn't start and we don't get that news until tonight or tomorrow morning, because if he doesn't start, no, since Bruce becomes a much worse plate.
At that point, I would rather have a lot more guys and a lot more interesting other players.
Now you compare it to the Houston players at that point.
Tomorrow, all their wide receivers will be there may be already owning them, though.
You can pivot the Jeff but dead in that same game at wide receiver, you'll leave a lot of money on the table. Go Flynn Nagel.
So there's obviously options to wither away from just not as secure options, or at least the best I would say so.
B I'm tentatively expecting Josh Johnson to start with.
The reports say right now, any interest in the showdown sleeps.
Also, Tompkins is listed as a reserve.
You concerned? Yeah, I have no interest in Deandra Tompkins now Zach Jamison showdown states I'm not playing.
Um, look, I think you have a better edge in XFL showdown. That NFL showdown.
Yes, but the edges in showdown in general, no matter how much information you have, are pretty terrible.
Because if you don't have the fourth string receiver who catches a touchdown on his only catch in that game, you could pinpoint the four games late. Absolutely right.
That doesn't matter.
The guy's got six fantasy points, a catch for two yards in touchdown.
But on the showdown say that's costing you winning any major money.
So I don't really have much interest in trying toe play.
If they were bigger, Price Bull's eye might.
But yeah, I think the four game sites the two games late, they're even okay, but mainly sticking to the game.
Four game slates I watched.
He's a couple of streams.
Yours is the most informative You're doing Awesome.
Number one in my book. Thank you.
Appreciate that crimson type.
Thank you. Appreciate that.
Jonas is Yes, I do.
About five hours a day on MBA alone.
This isn't fluid enough yet.
I do trust you saw, but I'd like to have a good grip on my myself.
I'll keep learning here for now.
That makes a ton of science.
You should not be putting your money behind anything.
If you don't officially trusted like trusting people blindly is, I would say, Ah, small percentage of being okay.
But like having a grasp of what's happening yourself in being able to also interpret other people's opinions, objective data and put your own subjective but subjective not meaning by it's just human reasoning into some of your decisions you're making.
So yeah, five hours a day in the n.
At this point, Um, since I'm a content for it, I probably spend that much time on it.
But the process for me is pretty fluent now in terms of waiting ownership in terms of having, you know, automated at that point having some trouble picking my flex spots.
What position should I load up on first time running XFL? Don't know if I should treat like NFL.
What's going on, Maxie? Welcome, Welcome.
So I guess I'll ask about the show.
Let me know how many people are watching.
And Elsa, you could hit the subscribe, but it helps out a ton totally free.
Uh, and try to get the 20,000 subscribers were like less than 800 away now, so pretty cool.
But I prefer wide receivers.
I made that pretty evident last week.
My lineups had only one running back in the running back position.
5% of my lineups had one running back in the Flex.
None of my line of said three running backs.
I have zero really zero interest in playing more than one running back this week.
I have the rules still set at most to what? Some constraints on that.
So I might get 1 to 2 running backs in a ton of lineups in the Flex.
But I strongly prefer wide receivers.
You have a ton of these running backs working in one offenses that don't care about running the ball.
The XFL prioritizes wide receivers in just the rules, the headsets, all that.
So it's a couple of things.
There's so many running backs by committees.
Not a lot of these running backs are running routes on average, I think the Bernie Mac's running like 14 routes.
On average, a couple broke free over 22 or three, some of those were in back fields where it's like Dallas, where cameras are in pain, had 22 routes run.
But there's four running backs running routes in that backfield, so it's really tough to prioritize that.
So, yeah, wide receivers, guys, we're gonna run 30 routes out there in our price.
Half the price of these.
Some of these running backs are guys that would much prefer getting to just way more opportunity for them.
I prefer running backs in the flight or wide receivers in the Flex.
Would you go Joe Horner Tomkins with that with the Tompkins news? Yeah, I don't want any Tompkins.
So, um, I guess I don't really have ah take right now in Joe Horn, but I would prefer anybody over Tompkins that's going to be running routes.
Tompkins is probably if the depth chart news is accurate.
If his foot injury is bothering him, you probably at that cheap price point.
He still find the play.
I think he runs 18 to 22 outs.
I don't think he runs 30 plus, if he does, he's a fantastic play.
But based on the news, I came out him being actively moved to the backup today behind Rashad Ross.
I'd be concerned.
I wouldn't want to be raw.
String him all that much like Look, you still have a major edge in the XFL.
If you're even tracking the Tomkins News compared to all the other people, I believe there might be overly too as well.
Yesterday saw that the contest weren't feeling as much.
Which is surprising on N B.
So maybe it's not a good sign right now, but yeah, I would prefer really anybody over Tomkins at this point.
Anybody was gonna start? Joe Horn is listed as a starter.
Um, he had a lot of opportunities last week, of course.
A target seven on some sites where we looked, but charting it, he had, I believe eight.
Yeah, I think he looks better than Tompkins.
I heard you comment on the amount of edge that was their last week.
Loads of Ed last week.
Do you receive this edge? Still available, or as it dissipated? Definitely is anticipated.
There's a ton of veg out there because we're not gonna find an injury news until right before.
There's going to be people still trying to spend the entire salary cap today when I think the most optimal ways to probably still have money left on the table, not as much as last week, where you could have had 8 to $10,000 a great lineup left on the table.
But, yeah, there's still a strong edge out there.
You don't have more people popping up a content.
If anything, you have less people popping up with content because week one they didn't do good themselves or they think that they didn't get enough.
You worship to make it work.
Like places that I've seen do free content in terms of video and podcast format for D.
F s specifically that I would trust.
Um, again, I make a lot of content.
I do business in the background side, I guess about the best resource to source this because I'm not typing in the F S picks on YouTube like a lot of people who watch my contacts are, but I do the show with awesome Oh, so I know they're doing it, and then I know that I'm doing.
I know those people behind a wall is probably releasing very good content but free content.
There's not a lot.
There's not a lot of information out there.
Um, I if you had somebody open up the XFL slate today that either played last week or is going to play for the first time this week and you told them to build the lineup and then you face them heads head to head, you would have a huge edge.
And if you take that same edge and putting into tournaments and max out three maxes and 20 maxes and get a lot of lineups in 250 if you want, you will have a good edge.
Yes, the edge has has reduced since last week because now we have game logs.
We have snap counts, and people could look at that will use it in May, Contin on it, but it has not dissipated by any means.
The casual in an NFL week will know what the players are, what their roles are in the offense.
For the most part, there's not much EJ left there. It's very, very.
This is still very, very inexpensive, plain GPS, but the casuals will open up to say today, especially they're playing for the first time and still be roster and cameras are in pain and still be roster.
And Christian Michael, Um, and not knowing what Jordan Pam who did last week and not knowing who's starting at Tampa Bay in L.
Right, they're just not going to know that stuff I loaded up on wide receivers. Wrong decision.
Seems about good.
Do you see any benefit and paying up at running back? It depends on how you want to line up some.
I think you could. You look pretty good paying up for running back.
I think there's running back plays all across the board.
I'll go to the running back page right here.
I currently think there's only eight running backs and play, um, in any format, cash or GDP, you can talk me into one more, maybe depending on some injury news.
Like Larry Ross, he's going to see more snaps with Joint Harris out.
Uh, but paying up for running back pretty much means you're playing hope Joel Presley or Devon Smith.
I think they're both fine options are going to get there.
I think the four K range is also really strong.
Nick Ali lines Dunbar.
There is Victor.
I think the next year, in the sixth year in So like paying a running back probably means you're playing Devon Smith or Presley.
I assume, like I don't consider Elijah Hood or James Butler in the six K range pay up options.
So I don't think there's anything wrong with playing Presley or Debbie on Smith.
So no, I don't think there's anything wrong with paying up.
I don't have a strong stance on whether you want a paper.
Not it's specific to the lineup you're making.
Um, no, really strong stance.
These are guys that I've been a playful, both expensive and cheap running backs on D K.
Do you find yourself using wide receivers in the Flex Martin remix? Yeah, I have a rule set not to use more than two.
I might actually make that lineup.
I'm not actually make that rule set to just not even use running backs in the Flex.
Last week, I only had, um, 5% my line on foot running backs in the Flex, and only one running back now to 95% of my life didn't have any money back in the Flex ended up working out great.
Obviously, that can change week to week.
But if we look at the XFL for a full time game season, even factor in their postseason, I would assume that more times than not, wing lineups will have one running back in them or at most two total.
Um, I like Johanna Johanna Lot because he's a slot receiver and DC allowed a lot to the slot receiver pro.
Well, yeah, That's a little bit noisy, though, so Joe Horn look fine. He had the opportunity.
Nothing terrible to say about him.
He's dirt cheap for some reason, but to go off of last week's slot performance from pro well against them, I think, is a little bit too skewed in small sample.
It's good to bring up when you're trying to make a point for him like you are but ultimate sports kid.
But Pro scored a 57 yard touchdown 65% of his yardage on a on a catch in run Met was a terrible tackle and then one of the worst angles I've ever seen to a tackle by a defensive back ever.
So that is very skewed, like 65% of his yardage you throw in the touchdown.
Even more of his production comes on the back of that.
He only he's quarterback playing Brandon Silver's, he's banged up.
BJ Daniels can easily come in, and he's a mobile quarterback.
Um, obviously, that's That's the case against parole this week, but it's a little bit skewed when 65% of your yardage comes on and play.
That was one of the worst defensive plays of the week.
And on the opposite side of that game, um, care Carrie, Carrie leaves or whatever is touched on the tight end was also one of the worst tackling efforts.
You slow as molasses, and he didn't even put a juke on both defensive backs like fall on the ground.
If you didn't see, Definitely.
Look, you won last week with a guardian stack.
We're playing head to head because I don't think The Guardian said that Great.
I mean, we're going definitely was in the top two or three quarterback option.
Um, I guess Joe Horn did well if you had him.
So you asked me, Matt McGloin or Carl Jones.
I mean, just based on my quarterback interests I don't have my Mongolian marked as a like interest that with that much so I would go Cardell Jones there, these wide receivers.
I have 16 players at wide receiver.
You can tell me that there's a little more little bit more that Aaron play.
Without a doubt. I currently have 16 players.
Um sports news alert over on SportsCastr following on SportsCastr If you have not already very cool technology on SportsCastr, that's just a little implements in the top of my video.
Important with them for about a year or so.
But they were the first people on a streaming app that you can record your face and what's in front of you at the same time.
So, like, if you're at a game, no baseball game, the game today in D.
Um, you could be recording yourself in the corner of the screen while recording the game pretty cool.
Both cameras at once, he asks, Where can you play the F s XFL? You played on draftkings? You played on fanduel? I don't believe that fantasy draft isn't offering it yet.
Drafted is not I don't believe it.
Superdraft or any of those are so draftkings and Fanduel.
You complain? I don't know.
Open up the four game slates.
Their product is just just gross, but for a lot of things.
But Draftkings has four games late sports and alert.
I would recommend you going and checking on droppings if you're looking to play amusing Flynn Nagel just cause he fits in my lineup.
Is that all right? Yeah, I think from Flynn.
Nagel is just a price, really well, like you have a different quarterback who might throw down the field more.
But Flynn Nagel secured this role really early on 29 rounds last week.
Six targets like I think you can bank on Flynn Nagel for, like, a five target game every week.
And then your upside is Oh, wow, Landry Jones likes him a lot.
They're playing sort of a a spread offense that they're gonna be going air raid short, quick passes last week.
That can change, but seems like that's what Stoops wants to do.
Then you Flynn Nagel.
If he becomes the favorite target this week of of Landry Jones, it could be a 10 upside day in terms of targets.
So I think he's appropriately priced.
I don't think there's anything terribly wrong with Flynn Nagel this week.
How much? Hey, Sal, how much money would you leave on the table As much as your heart desires, like you're just not gonna leave as much as last week because you had so many wide receivers in the three K range last week and you had field Nelson at 78 or Phillip Walker at 7800 and obviously 1/4 of the Fields lineups.
He looked fantastic.
He's price stuff, right? But you have Tom and priced up a little bit, but I'm fine, leaving multiple $1000 on the table this week.
Like the difference is that, like somebody just asks.
Oh, I like playing Flynn Nagel.
The difference between leaving no money and leaving 2 to $3000 on the table is playing Donald parm over Flynn Nagel, right? His teammate site And who's gonna run similar outs? Maybe a little bit more deeper outs for $3000? That's right, and there's no wrong decision in playing Donald Parma overflowing Nelson, in my opinion this week, and you put $3000 on the table so you might have already had 1000 on the table, so I really don't have a limit.
If you have $5000 on the table this week, I don't think you're making wrong decisions.
There's like 4 to 5 guys in the three K range that seemed very viable to me this week.
And if you're playing 1 to 2 of them, you'll probably have a lot of money left over.
Where can you play defense for free? I mean, I'm assuming draftkings Still, those free contests they used to do just zero by and heads heads and things like that.
Miami cares all day, so I would recommend checking out draftkings and fanduel.
Okay, so this is the same person I believe he asks.
Where can you play the f s for free? Also on SportsCastr? Yeah.
Draftkings and Fanduel.
You can't win prizes, though.
I mean, sometimes they do free rules, but not usually you can just play for free.
Like if you win.
You're just mourning for bragging rights and fun to watch the game like a like a week to week.
That's just fantasy league, but that's about it.
Where do you follow XFL news? I can't find it anywhere.
I personally have a couple of personal sources that I established before the season started a little bit discussing stuff that they have with the teams.
XFL new sub has some really good articles.
I mean, it's just a simple is I follow the statistics after the fact.
Pff on a couple of other sites, I tried charging some of my own plays as well.
From games, Um, a couple of my own individual sources.
Twitter is fine with news.
There's I made a list of, like, 30 or 40 names to follow on Twitter for duty for XFL news.
So yeah, it's not easy.
Especially before the season started.
You're literally going on Google.
You're literally trying to find the source is that you see as reasonable and you're reading as much as you can for the preseason.
I was reading, like, four hours of just twit, Twitter and, um, Twitter lists and notes, a week or a day, not a week in the mornings and throughout the days.
But yeah, the XFL website has some articles as well that are pretty decent from beat reporters and yeah, and then it just establishing connections before the season started with some of these beat writers slash people that cover the league and trusting their opinion since they're there with the team.
I really like the Jones and made that combo.
Is there any better? I don't know what you mean, if there's any better, but Jones and Cadet, they're probably gonna go lower own than most quarterback wide receiver combinations this week.
So I think it looks fine.
So I love to hear the grind you out and help us win money, eh? No problem, Jake.
I love doing this.
It's fun. I I like them.
So like I like W N B A preseason NFL and XFL the most.
Not only is it still the most profitable, I think sports, um, India fests in a little less variant when you're talking about the w N B A.
But I like the idea that not a lot of people produce content.
So, like the podcast version of my YouTube show is is currently like gravitating between 15th and 30th.
Today it was like 27 to 21st side school because I'm putting out content and there's just no NFL and PJ already started, so it's like Lowell's in terms of getting viewership and growing.
And then I just like the grind of, like, creating story lines before they happen.
What's up? What's going on? But I feel he says, What's up, Sal? Great work.
Number one content provider I found for XFL.
Big fan from the also shows.
Keep it up. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate your yeah.
Check out the awesome oh, stream that I'm stag tonight did yesterday.
Also the one thing I will point out, um, Pff has zero routes run for Elijah Hood.
Couple people reached out on Twitter and said that they had him at 24.
I don't know if they were self charging on if they were using some other data source, but and then he was on the field out wide.
Often eso If you put Elijah that 20 rounds around, he goes from a guy that I didn't have as much interest in to a guy that I have a good amount of interest in the top five r B interest this week, so that's worth pointing out.
Like in the video.
I said that he didn't run the routes, was going off a Pff they still have him.
Apparently, they have looking at other data sources they have on Lee.
Elijah had wrong, which makes sense that he ran fleeing 55 snaps.
It would be seem odd that he doesn't run around, but that's what they had a map.
At the end of the day, it's best for people to do their own research.
Yeah, it would be best, but this is the issue you can't write like if you're working in a 9 to 5 and, like my average viewers 80% of my viewers between the ages of 25 50 and, like 50% of those between the ages of like 35 55.
So most people probably married with kids and they're all males.
If you're working 9 to 5, you get up at eight.
You're obviously not doing anything in the mornings.
You get home at five. You can be. You eat dinner.
You do some of the kids.
I'm doing on average, I don't know.
A week, 20 hours of XFL research when when when you factor in looking at statistics and trying to dig through those as well.
30 to 40 hours of expel research a week.
A full time job like it is best for people to do their own research because you would feel like I feel right now pretty confident about today, pretty confident about last week.
But you just can't like like this is my job.
Like if you're working a 9 to 5 job and you think you can do enough research without using any other source of the content mine, any of the paid sites.
Also most then you are probably working like 120 hour weeks over 100 hour weeks.
Do you think James Butler makes a repeat performance from Week One, I think is very sketchy.
I think he's in play.
I have him listed here and play.
But here's the thing.
The Angelo Henderson left early in the first quarter.
Damsel Henderson is not playing tonight, so let's get right.
James Butler had 44 snaps, 36 more than Andre Williams, so he should be all, by all accounts, be the lead back today.
He also scored two touchdowns on 11 touches, and I think he, by all accounts, supposed to be his best performance of the season.
This team doesn't want to run the ball.
This team doesn't throw the ball that running backs.
He only 18 routes in about three and 1/2 quarters, a play or something.
So even if you give him 10 rounds around below the average of about 15 from Week one, Andrea one Andre Williams ran one route.
Butler, at 6300 looks a lot like Elijah Hood.
Elijah had sucked last week.
I imagine the ownership is lower.
Butler, I imagine, sees very similar usage in terms of the carries.
Butler probably see somewhere around 10 maybe 12 carries.
I'm skeptical he was on the field in the red zone, but I'm skeptical that you might see Andre Williams come in for some red zone snaps.
Either way, the end of the day Butler was very good last week.
Game love watchers will put him in over A guy like Elijah Wood or Elijah Hood and Elijah Hood apparently ran about double Humana routes as Butler last week.
So there's a lot of guys you can say the same thing about this week.
Darius Victor, right, 70% of the workload compared to Tim Cook that could easily flop but learn Elijah Hood look like the guys who have the strongest grasp on their individual backfield.
Pretty close as well, although he only played 10 more snaps in time free, 75% of Gary's.
But Butler in Hood look really similar to me.
And if I had a project ownership, I would assume Butler comes in higher.
He's in an offense that does not care about running backs.
Clearly doesn't care about tight ends.
They have none of the team.
So do I think Butler can be in winning lineup today at 6300? Yes, he's gonna touch the ball 10 to 12 times upside of like 14 to 15 in probably the best offense that we've seen so far in this league s o, he has upside.
I just don't think it's as secure as a lot of people. Probably think.
If there's looking at game lungs last week, phones on Pumphrey starting.
You got to start last week, but he ended up seeing less snaps, and Presley last touches by why a wide margin probably ended up with.
I believe 75% of touches.
The DC offensive line just looked terrible in general, so Presley would be the guy go to their price targets.
Seven k makes it a little bit more less appealing and that often sublime.
One thing that I did on Tuesday and Wednesday, really a lot would just look at all the offensive lines.
The biggest thing coming into the season was for me, defensive linemen.
Offensive line matchups would be scary, like often survives.
You need chemistry, you need a ton of snaps.
Together, they played one preseason game, right? So a lot of these offensive lines look bad.
DCs is probably looking the worse.
They didn't open up any running, Leans, Um, and they really did not do much for Cardell Jones.
He was pressured on.
38% of dropbacks only kept clean 62% of the time.
For a guy who's pretty big body than somewhat mobile, um, needed decently mobile.
It's concerning so yep, DC offensive line looking a bit worrisome.
I'm getting a lot of Darius Victor and my crunches.
What's your thoughts on him? Thinks I would prefer him to Tim Cook.
He played 70 points.
6% of the snaps last week.
He grand like 10 routes and had three targets on them.
So I think he overproduced in his receiving game last week.
So if you're going to wait that anyway, I think that that might not be great.
Like expecting him to see three receptions on 10 routes.
Run is probably not something you're gonna get for most of these backs.
But he did seem to be the guy working as the backup.
Only two running backs used in New York between Coke and Victor that I would prefer in New York.
So, yeah, he's the cheapest that I would go running back this week at 40. 100.
That lead play was hilarious. Yeah, it was gross.
It was so, so bad.
Um catches the ball wide open on the double flea flicker.
We're good for the XFL, right? It created just shockwaves.
Pretty early on from a double flea flicker, whatever it was.
But the man catch the ball wide open share two guys just like dive like little just dive in the fourth.
Don't even tempt attacked the guy. Terrible.
Are those rankings your favorite to least favorite? No.
Oh, everything you're seeing on the screen right now is not filtered by anything not favored by favorite, the least favorite.
It is just me going in here inputting exes by their names and then just factoring it by the exes and ends.
If you want my specific rankings and tears, I'll call it out once again for people that are in there.
Now I have patri on linked up down below every single position.
I have tears and rankings for exactly who I would play ahead of who I also have a podcast on there that gets in depth about my interest.
I'm a little bit more in depth, and this is going to be This is just sort of like a player pool interest base.
But yeah, um, patrons.
Where you wanna go for that? You can sign up on Patron link down below XFL priority and or the Hall of Fame. Tears will get you those.
Those are the Hall of Fame membership will get you the patron rankings and tears.
They went out yesterday morning based on the injury report that came out last night and some of the news that came out me doing more research.
They have been changed a little bit throughout the day Yesterday.
Made final adjustments this morning while shooting the podcast at, like six.
I am 6 15 I am East Coast time.
Top salary savers.
Yes, I mean running backs.
Just these guys that are listed here.
Holly's 48 Dunbar's 46.
I think those cheap five options.
Why deceive You have a lot.
You have Hornet 34 caliber, 39 with potential backup quarterback, but still cheap enough for your outs last week.
Look pretty decent.
Believe he was targeted seven times and overthrowing a touchdown pass.
Donald Part in tight and 3200.
He's employed Trey McBride if he's active at 4000 with likely no sight of Black because he's doubtful this week after back ran 43 outs last week, McBride.
I would expect to get in the mix.
A Donna's Jennings is still listed as a starter. Three. K flat.
Another cheap option for you, although wasn't used that heavily last week.
Let Damian Washington is probably the ST Louis receiver I like the most, ran the most routes looked like the most wide receiver ready, had a couple of deep targets as well.
Had a couple of screen targets as well.
So I kind of drops down all the deep yards that you're going to see for him.
But five targets.
Those air cheap options.
Marcus Lucas is well in ST Louis.
A tight end that Ran is a wide receiver for the most part closer. Chief options.
There's really not cheap guys this week.
Like Phillip Walker was the cheat code last week at a cheap price.
Jordan Sam was like the cheapest guy that I would want to get to this week in 8900.
Don't think there's anything wrong. So those are the cheap options.
Like these exes. They're just my interest right now.
They're not ranked in any way here on YouTube.
They are in Pedro.
Take the June Jones offense in cash every week.
So, Houston? Yeah, from what they did last week, they pretty much said, we're gonna spread it wide, and we're just gonna throw the ball deep right through the ball.
11 times deep, 30%.
Walker's drop back to a deep pass is crazy.
Vandal has four games out. We'll finally.
That's good because they're two games.
Contests do not fill. Last week.
Um, and I'm sure they tried to blame the XFL. But then look at drafting.
It was like draftkings filled and then actually had a 20001st contest right after that.
I'll probably play the Sunday slate for draftkings.
Um, because I think there is.
There's a lot more just honestly, look so much better.
Like a lot of my line of probably have, like 123 guys at most playing today.
Overall, in the two games, right, you have just the best teams on this late tomorrow, potentially Dallas, Houston, ST Louis, ST Louis and Houston's gonna be actually a fun game.
The two best quarterbacks from Week one, in my opinion.
Yes, Cardell Jones.
Statistically wise looked the best, or maybe one of the best.
But you're talking about fantasy wise during Shamu. Exciting.
Don't have to throw that much.
I feel Walker very excited, right? So I'm actually looking forward that they did a good job moving the times back to 6 p.m.
Eastern time for that night game on Sunday, a little bit more prime time.
I don't know if they scheduled it that way.
Like changed the matchups.
Don't know if it was always supposed to be ST Louis in Houston last, but makes sense that they made that their big primetime game.
So I make more lamps of Landry Jones or Tamil.
So I think Tom, who offers you more upside this week because he's probably have to throw more against Houston.
And he still is that rushing upside but upside in terms of, I'll say Tama offers you more security.
Maybe not. Upside is the right word.
Where's Landry? Jones is uncer*****y.
He's probably lower on the tournaments.
People are gonna pay up either for Jones or I would imagine Walker or go down to Tomo.
I think Landry Jones is a good G P P play.
Um, I think he's going all four months at that price point, but I think is the fact that people don't know what to expect from him.
Keeps him a little bit more lower own.
Whereas last week coming in before we knew about Phillip Walker and during Shamu, Landry Jones may have been the highest owned quarterback on the slate, so he's gonna go from the highest one.
Toe may be an afterthought today.
Okay? Jeremy Dorn, ICC asks, Who's your top quarterback? You talk to our necks in your top wide receiver.
Salary savers Jeremy don't make.
I do not build lineups here for you.
I do have all of those rink position my position on Patron, but I am not in the business of discussing who is my favorite play in every single position on a sport where there's only four games for a week.
So I I, um, in a for effort.
I do have favorites every position, but not something that not something that's going to be offered here.
Why not? Tompkins? He is listed now is the backup.
They actively made the conscious decision to put John Ross ahead of him on the depth chart yesterday.
That's concerning coming up with a foot injury that's concerning.
We saw similar things happen last week for a couple of players.
That, and they're being ruled out.
Tompkins is not probable, so I mean, you could still get the Tomkins.
It's just if I now know the news that I'm not.
A lot of people will know that.
Tomkins yes, was a starter last week, but as of yesterday, listed as a backup, that's a little concerning Rashad Ross learning the offense more and more snaps for him.
Um, my interest in Tompkins has gone from one of my favorite place in the slate to somebody.
I would be fine having 0% of who's your favorite four wide receivers.
Who is? Who is offense is June Jones offense? June Jones is a coach.
He's a Houston Roughnecks coach, but a guy who just want to throw the ball time for Houston.
He's not a player, he's just a coach.
Do you really like any Vipers? Wide receivers with the quarterback up in the air? Yeah, I think so.
I mean, like Dan Williams with a price up is not as appealing anymore.
Jamie Oliver cheap price point is fine.
Um, Williams is still fine, but look, Aaron Murray was no world beater last week.
I'm pretty sure he liked lives with Dan Williams, so that's like, not great for Dan Williams again.
But, yeah, I think you get to Tampa wide receivers.
They're they're definitely not anywhere near the most appealing wide receivers in the sleep, But I would have someone a player pool like Aaron Murray.
This might be an upgrade if they actually start Taylor Cornelius in Gela.
Corny, Cornelius had a really good senior year in Oklahoma State.
Um, obviously, the downside is if they use a little bit more of Quinn flowers, who's going to be a wildcat cyber guy? Do you have a line of generate for XFL? I don't have my own line of generator use.
Third parties love the WNBA.
Yeah, W me is great if anybody watching this is, ah, worker in the w N B A or knows somebody who works there, plays in the WNBA.
Tell them to hit me up so we can develop some sort of partnership to get their marketing better.
Whether it's through my video specifically or me helping them in the back end with my media company because their marketing is absolutely drew, their social media presence is not existed.
The marketing of their players is not existed.
Theat news like YouTube channels in podcast is not existent.
The fact that they can't even get TV deals and now they're just offering.
Paid for content for TV is a step forward, right? Buying like a $10 a month past watch the WNBA games is they pay for a step forward, But not a lot of people wanna watch them, let alone pay $10 a month.
Watch him make it for free.
But there's a lot to say about the WNBA's marketing.
It is a lead that has a ton of promise in a ton of great athletes to people on Twitter who like to put on the common sections.
I forgot who was a one ball there.
Somebody Lee somebody.
Posted a pretty funny tweet, but pretty much saying like there's so many guys in the comments that say they can beat these w N b A players one on one, there is zero chance.
Unless you went to a D one college and played at Duke or UNC.
Maybe you have a shot but beating professional women's wear freak athletes.
Random people in sort of you're not gonna do that.
It's Sammy Coates gonna be uber talk again this week.
Um, burns a lot of people last week, but the casuals notice his name.
So I imagine he's gonna be popular again.
Um, key for outmatched Jones.
Question. Move listed as starters.
Um, yeah, Right now, it's just keep forces out.
Matt Jones is questionable, but expected to play.
I expect Matt Jones to resume the split two workers back load.
They're not reading too much into that depth chart for Michelle unless Matt Jones is ruled out.
Eric Johnson is one of our like only 5% of over 55 year olds watching you go Eric with something, man.
It's hardly a good running back.
Or do I consider anyone else? Holly is a wide receiver that it's labeled as a running back, so he's a wide receiver in the best passing situation in the league.
I think he's fine.
Oh, Holly plays wide receiver ran 27 major routes at wide receiver last week.
I saw five targets for receptions.
Nice catch down the field.
He's cheap enough so that if he sees five or six targets at 4800 he surely in play.
Yeah, is your wider super list in order of preference? No, that is listed in tears on patron.
My wide receivers list is not listed in any type of order of preference.
If I've labeled, if I filter this by Price, it will make a lot of use knows pop up.
So I filtered it by wise.
I don't know what Google Sheets filters by.
After that, it might be filled during it by whatever's in the first word of this column.
First letter, this column. I have no idea.
So I So I'll say that once again, what you're seeing on this YouTube channel when you're seeing the exes is just a player pool.
You're not seeing a single player that none of these players were ranked at all.
Yet wide receivers not rained, either.
Um, they're just 18 16 players that I have interested in.
Wide receiver ate at running back in four at quarterback, currently ranked over on Patron, if indeed interested.
Do you like them very wide receivers with the Q B up in the air? Yeah, I think they're stone play.
They're nowhere near as solid because I don't even care that Murray's out like he's not that great.
The downside is that putting flowers might play a lot more, and by all accounts, he's going to be much more of a rushing in.
Mobile player quarterback.
Hey, Sal, Joe Horner.
Kind of a toss up.
I don't really have a strong stance in England.
They were both using very similar spots and both their offenses.
Joe Horn probably is the better quarterback, but he's further down on the depth chart.
It's Oliver quarterback up in the air, but higher up on the depth chart. Move a priority.
I have very equal amounts of both of them.
Who's starting for Seattle at quarterback? It's burned in silver's for Seattle.
Seattle starting Brandon Silver's.
If you're asking Tampa Bay, it's gonna be split between Taylor Cornelius and Quentin Flowers today.
But Seattle is bearing.
The silver is probably the worst quarterback after one week of football not named Philip Nelson.
So going into this week, he's probably the worst quarterback.
At the end of the day, this is all luck.
I very strongly disagree that there is a large factor of any GFS game mode.
That is luck, but you're not awesome over Chipotle A or the top players in the world and profiting continuously.
I profit of the offense.
You're not doing that based on luck.
If you were, you were very few amounts of people that are blindly making lineups and in winning strong amounts of Defensor luck.
But it's about putting yourself in the position to get lucky, like anything else.
If a year and 1/2 ago I sat on my couch every day and said, I'll get lucky, I'll somehow maybe a full time content creator making you I'll just get lucky.
No, that's not That's not how it works.
You don't get lucky to be doing what I'm doing and what everybody else in the defense industry is doing.
You put in work and you open yourself up to the opportunity to get exposure similar to the F S.
And put yourself in those situations that in the offense you've been contests in your work.
People notice you and give you a shot shot out.
Also motion about May.
What percentage owns? Do you think Walker comes in it? Um, it's a good question, really.
Not seeing any ownership projections for XFL yet makes sense.
Not a lot of history on it.
Walker's ownership with Landry Jones and it will be a little bit lower, but I'd expect Walker to be the highest quarterback if I take a wild guess what his ownership is.
Um, I'd say somewhere it should be somewhere on 50%.
I'll say it comes in in the 40% range.
It should be like 50% but I'll say people don't jump on quick enough.
Price point up limits it a little bit.
Robert Boy says Aaron Rodgers is a top play.
Use the most turnover prone.
I mean, probably Brandon Silvers.
Probably Brandon suffers, obviously, Cornelius.
If Quinn Flowers are not seasoned by any means.
If Josh Johnson is out, the top play on this late at defense probably becomes Dallas with Jalen McClendon gonna be playing him, probably throwing 3 to 4 interceptions if he stays in that long.
Nick O'Dell formal had a nephew game, and Murray is out.
But what? But was the team's top draft pick? How do you like him? Yeah, Truesdale, a tight and returned for a touchdown last week. New York.
I mean, he's price where he should be.
Someone. I was much interest in Truesdale.
I'm really not that much.
That stuff is like, how I I really don't have much interest in inside and probably sees another three or four targets.
Um, maybe you read about Tompkins there.
But both those options seem pretty gross.
I caught the tail end of your time consuming.
Would you mind repeating in the apartment? Tomkins was seen as the backup.
Rashad Ross was listed as the starter.
So I no longer have any sort of priority interest or even really secondary interest in Deandra Tompkins.
He was listed as the backup on the depth chart, so he went from being a top priority of mine. Oh, yes.
A strong interest of mine at that price 00.
2 might be running as the wider issue before might be running half the routes is a lot of other guys this week in that price range.
So not gonna get there South is a double fantasy.
This is a good question.
It's a good question.
What's up? So how does the double forward past affect fantasy scores do to people get credit? No.
So if I am to throw the ball to you and then you were the one who throws it downfield.
Only you get credited with the yardage, the passing yardage.
The first player who is usually the quarterback will not.
Um, so I hope that makes sense.
But that's a really good question.
Only the player who is affected by the Double Four paths.
And I don't think we really saw any last week, so I don't think it's gonna become that big of a factor.
The XFL has its own YouTube channel, as it should.
I definitely as it should.
Only the player making the second pass gets credit.
Exactly. Victor, thank you. Yes.
Hey, Sal, in your tears.
Would you say the Tier three would be the start of your GpB rankings? Asks Ed Ed. Good question.
So I mentioned in the podcast today.
The top tears that I have for cash on Patriot are also strong place for G.
P's The tears where you start to get to your three in Tier four.
Our guys are guys that I would really only try to be playing in GP piece.
So the reason that I create more tears on the cash game tears on Patri on is to give you ideas of who else is in a player pool for me and where they would drink.
So yes, like tears.
Three through four.
It would be like the interest in GPS that I have, but you can easily play any of those guys.
It's just more like a longer player.
Pool for GP piece.
Who do you prefer from the Houston Big three? Or who do you like most to pivot off of coats? Louis or camp? Um, clear.
Lewis plays out of the slot, and he was priced up majorly so I don't have as much interest in clear Luis.
Like different positions with Nick Ali.
Cause new colleagues, for some reason, still listed as a running back.
But Julia Louis is double the price is Nick Ali.
They're probably gonna run the same amount of routes.
So I would prefer Phillips, Holly and Coats all ahead of clear loose.
Did you cash last week? Yes, I did.
I had about, um, $2000 in play and we three is either 3.
But it was a very good week is a very good first week.
Um, had a ton of money in cash games played every single tournament that you possibly could had action down on a few sites.
217 are currently watching only 29 legs and sad guys.
Sound does an amazing job. Deserves the credit. Closer chat.
Hit that like. But then we open the check.
Yes, so I appreciate that.
Yeah, and the like.
But if you like, it helps the video a little bit like I would say, like maybe 1%.
Like buns don't help as much anymore, especially on live streams.
They kind of act is like a a What's the word? Like a review for that video Like people, if people themselves look at the like buttons, which not only people do as a way to Should I watch this video or not, More people look at viewership and subscribers.
So hit the subscribe on because watch time is the thing that matters most.
If you're still watching this on the replay, for some reason, be sure to check out my page on.
Be sure to hit the subscribe on everybody.
Watching this should follow me on Twitter.
I'm posting a lot of updates there.
Statistic wise for NFL are XFL lots of other stuff working on some NFL projects in the background.
Currently, who lined you up? Yeah.
I mean, really **** good barber shops here.
Um, Puerto Rican barbershop.
I would like to say, uh, maybe he's Dominican either.
Work. Um, I'm not positive.
The actual nationality there, but very good barbershop.
His name is the monster.
Once we get 20,000 off to do a big giveaway, somebody asked, um, I assume we're like, we're gonna be by the end of the day, Hopefully, like, 700 subscribers away from 1000.
Um, and I over 20,000.
I don't wanna get 20,000 for somebody said, It just seems like a pretty cool goal.
Obviously, it's a pretty big just a round number. Hold.
Someone said a couple times, but you hit the subscribe button.
Tell your friend, your brother, your mother, your sister share this on Twitter.
I appreciate all that.
Speaking of Twitter, let me see if anybody's mentioned anything news wise.
Yes, my guest today is that the X Files ratings go down.
Hopefully a decent percentage like 10% plus, but hopefully not a ton.
at least for the first game, the steps out.
How much money remaining? How much salary remaining is too much this week? Yeah, I don't really have a strong stance on that again.
We guidelines for eight K left over more than that, um, this week, like if you have four or 5000 left over, it's hard to say that you're playing the wrong way, like it's a difference between playing a $5000 wide receiver and one of the really great $3000 wide receivers this week.
So if you have lives to 3 $4000.
5 even, I think they're okay.
I think this is a week where you don't need to do that as much because the price is a little bit more efficient.
We now knows what these players rolls air like, but there's still enough value out there, especially a wide receiver that I think you could leave a few 1000 on the table and feel good.
Do you think Walker should be faded in gp piece? No, no.
If you wanna play 100% Phillip Walker, by all means go out and do so.
Um, that offense looked superior than any other offense we saw last week by a wide margin.
Um, and I don't think it's a fluke.
Philip Walker and GPS.
Yes, I think there's other good or other good quarterback options this week in a lot of them.
Tommy Jones, Cardell Jones, Landry Jones and Cardinal.
But fading in seems a bit steep.
Okay, Can we see the water? Right? Supers page.
You met? Um, no bomb.
How much stacking would you do? Is a quarterback into wide receivers from one team too much? No, I think that's fine.
I think stockings find like the obviously the lineup construction for the XFL format is different with flexes only one running back.
I think stacking should still be a priority in terms of If you're playing a quarterback, you better have a least one of his pass catchers with him.
It only makes sense having Philip Walker last week, and none of his pass catchers didn't add up to you.
Now, if you want to kind of play. Devil's advocate.
Jordan family had a fine game last week.
He ran for 77 yards on the ground.
You don't need to stack as much with Jordan Tama, but I still wouldn't want to.
Um, yeah, you should be playing at least one pass catcher with a quarterback in some offenses.
I'm finally, if you want to play Jeff Cadet, Phil Flynn, Nagel and Landry Jones today, I can't say anything bad about that.
Um, if you wanted to play Phillip Walker and two of his pass catchers, I think that's a strong option.
There's some teams that I wouldn't want to do it with like Tampa Bay in Seattle.
But I also want to be playing their quarterbacks.
If Josh Johnson starts and you want to pair him with Nelson, Spruce and McBride if he starts, I can't say much bad about that.
So, yeah, I think stacking the only thing that I wouldn't do in stacking is running it back.
I don't think you need to as much.
Obviously, the correlation is great if one of these games pop off.
But, um, I'm just more worried about quarterbacks post pass catcher stacks.
I don't wanna be running back or forcing in four players from one game when there's not that many roster spots offending sense.
It's still, correlation wise, A very good method.
Not a lot of people will do it and it should help you out.
But there's not that much time in your lineups, Nor these games are the seasons to really realize it.
So I don't think you have to get that different in the XFL.
That's a good question.
I personally do not think Walker outscores the other quarterbacks 40 to 50% of the time.
Now that's what we were saying.
We're saying if if you think Walker comes in 40 45% owned, it's not like the other quarterbacks coming in.
0% owned right? So if you have, I don't know.
Cardell Jones coming in at 33% in Jordan, Tama coming in at 28% in Landry Jones, coming in at 30%.
The gap is not 40 to 50% like it's not that he's that much higher on than the rest of them.
He's going to be coming in probably 10 15% higher on the next corner back and I think there's a very strong margin of the time.
He outscores that.
That gap with Tomkins lower on the depth chart doesn't get used in three weather super sets? I don't think so.
Um, lower own difference maker, perhaps in a g p p.
No, I don't want much.
Tompkins now, um, listed as a backup still cheap.
But, um, I don't think the ownership on him is like an edge anymore.
Somebody says You're lagging.
Am I lacking? I don't know.
I'll be in for another five minutes.
Do you see flowers and Cornelius splitting slaps as snaps? Asks Tyler White.
Yes, Coach already said So.
Marc Trestman already said, They're going to be splitting snaps.
Are you considering starting more than one running back on D cake? Being contrarian or sabotage, I'd say more sabotage like I've had the same thoughts with myself.
I don't think that more than one running back is that viable. Definitely not.
Three running backs in the lineup does not seem viable, even if it happens to win one of these weeks.
That's one week out of the 10 or 12 with the postseason, but not enough people in these contests are thinking about it that way.
They're not thinking, Oh, I shouldn't play Elijah Hood and Darrel Presley and a colleague at running back on my same lineup.
They're not thinking that the upside is crushing them.
People in this chat are, but that's 304 100 people at most out of the tens of 1000 people in this contest.
So I think that the better edge is not playing a lot more money. Max.
Two running backs in the winning lineup, that's fine.
I do not think you're going to see multiple running backs and winning lineups.
You do not was going up and attacked us.
How you doing when soldiers didn't look that bad to me? Feel pretty bad.
Um, I think you can pay down for him.
Why the negativity? Oh, no negativity.
I mean, I'm just looking at the stats.
The three touchdown passes to underst broken plays are not what I want to look at.
Terrible, Terrible when under pressure.
Terrible when kept clean in terms of accuracy.
Quarterback rating was not great.
Yards per 10th was atrocious.
Not much upside there for Brandon Silver's a guy who was pulled in that game for a few plays for Beata Daniels, and I would not be shocked to see that happen again, also has, without a doubt, the worst pass catcher surrounding him in the worst coaching staff surrounding him.
Sal and Stumble.
Yeah, he's the only thing from that backfield in Dallas that I would touch.
It's concerning, though, that there's four running backs up lead, 14 plus snaps.
So it's really hard to like Lance dumb or a ton, but I think he's okay.
Run back with spruce or small within a Dallas stack spruce.
But if Josh Johnson is out, I wouldn't want any of them.
Your thoughts in a Q B situation in L.
A. Basically a spruce and play.
I'm expecting Josh Johnson to start.
So with that, I think sports is in play.
If Josh, because you missed down in the 1st 2 games of Eli Rogers, McCall McKay, other guys you can replace him with.
But you do have the Houston guys in Jeff Cadet to get off of spruce with, but I would not wanna be playing Spruce if Josh Johnson doesn't play.
Not because of Josh Johnson not playing.
We saw Can Off had a fine game of spruce last week, but because jail McClendon looked absolutely atrocious last week.
Oh, yeah, no hat today. Just realize it.
So subliminal production says good workers.
Sal, your professionalism will take you a long way.
Keep it up. Thank you, man. I appreciate that.
Yeah, man, it's fine that the ex felons and people are enjoying it because, I mean, no NFL.
It's like peak season is obviously like the 1st 8 to 10 weeks of NFL season some of the playoffs, but I want to try and produce other content.
Obviously, MBA is still going out this, but maybe season long NFL, something that videos that can pop off from a viewership sampling, right, a video that could pop off and get 60,000 views right instead of like a daily 4 to 5000 view count.
It's more sustainable when its daily like that, and obviously you have people coming back.
But I think preseason NFL videos not about preseason football, but like in July, like, you know, running back rankings, those types of videos that will be important trying to work more on those.
Hey, Sal, if you're winning $100,000 at the end of the day today, are you doing it? wrong question, Mark.
What does that mean? You're saying, like so $100,000.
Say you have to think, like, play wrong players.
No, no, I don't think you're doing it wrong.
If you $100,000 I think that the idea is that I have about this late today, um, personally, with the research that I've done, I think they're sound ideas.
Um And then obviously you put yourself in place to get lucky.
And then at the end of the day, you open yourself up to be lucky.
Stagg said that McBride is out.
He's currently questionable.
McBride has not been ruled out currently questionable.
Do you ever see d k go to the Super Flex with XFL or NFL? So you can use to quarterbacks? I don't know.
I've thought about that.
Sometimes they might make a game old for that.
I don't know how how they think it would go over, but obviously, if it does, you want to get in early on how much that affects the sleep.
If you should be playing two quarterbacks or not, the XFL, definitely.
In fact, this late, you're pretty much locking in like two guys at 20 plus points.
Holly really isn't a running back, though.
You know he's not.
He's listed as a running back.
He did not play a single snap in the back field last week.
Is there an exit possible? Yeah, I think it's in.
Ah, Houston, Maybe they're quote unquote championship game.
It seemed like there were more plays per game in the XFL last week in Paris.
Did you notice that during your research, I charged some of these games not really know.
So in theory, there should have been more place because they have a shorter snap count.
So just naturally, there should be more place and the clock is always moving, so it's a faster pace of play.
But that's not what we saw last week.
Um, we just saw a lot of bad offenses, so it was just situation where they just didn't get a lot of plays off.
New York was just running the clock down, so in theory there should be more plays in the XFL.
But at the end of the day, when you have bad offenses, communication issues, whatever it is, and maybe this will get better as the season goes on, I think you're going to see very similar plays being run at the same pace as the NFL.
Now, some of the teams ran 70 place.
Some of them run nowhere near that so similar to the NFL.
In theory, it should be more, but they're just not that good.
Sorry already mentioned it.
How do you feel about James Butler? I think we know Daniel Henderson.
He's going to be in an offense that doesn't care about throwing to the running back.
Doesn't care about running the ball.
His two touchdowns last week probably skew his ownership.
I think I think he's fine at 6300.
I just don't think he's like an over the top priority play today.
He's very similar to Elijah Hood for me. Livelihood.
Same price point.
Gonna see similar touches on the ground.
Ran double the routes last week.
Um, so James Butler.
Just a mad play like I think I would rather not play James Butler and GDP than playing.
I think that's a good way to put it.
Do I think he's out of play? No, but do I think He's one of the 1st 2 names that people click on, if not the first name, that people click on to put in their G P P lines because of last week's results.
Yes, and that artificially bumps of his ownership higher than it should be.
Every piece of ownership that comes in on a player makes him a much worse playing G. P.
P's been players that don't have that ownership, and I think he would be a guy with high ownership today, so you should start NHL GFs out.
I have no time if I hired other people and made this more of like a A instead of a personal branding company.
Brown maybe, but don't really want to do that.
Um, like I cover MBA XFL right now M.
They're like balancing the three is difficult enough.
No way I can cover NHL has by far the least the smallest player pulls.
And from what I can understand, not that fun of a sport to play probably too expensive this week.
Yeah, he's he's grossly expensive.
65% of his receiving yards coming on one broken play pretty much last week with the words quarterback in the league.
Probably throwing him the ball this week.
$9200 a gross price tag.
Love for you, dude.
Still waiting to make my first Millie.
Indie Not sure if it will be in the offense. Probably not.
Not having much luck, but it's a ton of fun and cheap bound to be more in stocks.
Yeah, I mean, stocks.
You're gonna get your double your money every seven years if you're improper funds.
So if you're investing early, if you're a 20 year old watching this right now, get your ass out of that.
Hopefully, I'll be at a student that in about a month or two, probably end of April.
That'll be great.
A 23 can't wait.
Then invest 20% income herself every single year.
And, yeah, if you're a 20 year old watching this right now, the biggest vice I could give you get yourself out of debt.
Whatever it takes. Work your ass off.
Get yourself out of that.
Do not spend your money on stupid things.
Do not put a ton of money on a credit card.
Do not take out personal loans.
Um, get yourself out of that before taking out a personal loan, get a second job and work your ass off because that's the better way to go.
Long term for yourself.
Um, and you start investing.
You can You can pay cash for your home by the age of 30.
If you're 20 right now, uh, and probably be well on your way to have a $1,000,000 in retirement by the time you are 37.
Does that help? Um, free now, being listed as a top running back on the depth chart.
Change your opinion on him or Presley? No, He started last week, too.
And he just so I love your show.
You You're great Presentation and a good speaking voice.
Thank you, Jimmy.
I appreciate it.
I didn't even go to broadcasting school.
Um, I thought about it like a couple months ago, and then we're gonna teach me how to run some of the equipment which I could probably ask friends about that work in like l a right now in Hollywood sets.
I'm appreciated that my voice is good enough.
I don't know what it is.
I never got any training on it.
I guess I'm just an Italian from New York who likes to talk and got a decent enough accent to make a workout.
What's the most? You have one in the defense in a single day, 16,000 doll hairs.
That was earlier this season in the NBA.
The biggest contest that I have one have all been to $10,000 1st contests.
That was earlier this year, then at the Masters last year.
Um, but, yeah, I also don't shoot for the big contest.
I guess you could say, like, I'm never gonna win the 1,000,000 acre because I don't Mac sent to the 1,000,000 acre.
I think I could make a lot better money in a way.
I don't Mak center NBA's Sweets.
I've Max entered one embassy this year, um, into the big contest, all the accent there like the cheaper contest.
But look, the flashy stuff is winning.
50 Kate on Decatur first.
Of course, I'm going to be in contest today that have those price pulls the big one for for XFL.
I'm in the 2 22 that has 10 gator first.
That I think, is a much better contest.
Um, but I have just know, Like my goals for defense, sir.
Probably not like most people.
When I see $100,000 to first I go.
Okay, How many people are in the field? 30,000 I'm not playing the lottery today.
I'd like to go make money.
So I'm not as interested in cash games anymore because I think they're in M B A.
And really, in all sports at this point, it's like solved like you don't have much of an edge Single entry and three max.
I think those were really good formats.
Smaller fields, too.
So, like every single day more times and out of the MBA, my biggest upside in winning a contest is like $10,000 maybe sometimes 20,000 of them.
In one of those.
I rarely will be playing the big contest.
I will put my single entry line up into the big contest like MBA.
If I play the $100 England tree, the 3 33 to 5 55 there's only a couple people in those contests I would put.
That lineup also is the big one in case it pops off, but of one lined up in there.
I have really no interest in in trying to 1 50 Max does, because at the end of the day there's people who have been doing it longer.
I'm producing a ton of content, so I don't really care too much about 1 50 Maxing the big contests and having $1500 in one contest against pros.
So, yeah, I placing 133 next.
But yes, 16,000 was the most this year so far.
Various Victor interest. Yeah.
Uh, he's interesting to me.
I like the price point.
Um, him seeing three receptions on three targets on 10 rounds from last week is probably not going to continue, but I think he's gotta be, at least in play.
It's Paige's article.
He says McBride is out. Yeah, I know.
McBride is still questionable.
I could pull it up right now for you.
Trey McBride is good.
L a Jim McBride is questionable right here.
This is for the 16th.
That is tomorrow.
So he's questioning.
Do they have a tight end in the XFL? Yeah, they're listed as wide receivers.
Eso Some of the tight ends in the XFL are Nick Truesdale was a number one pick for Tampa Bay Donald Party and was only 3200.
I actually think is in play this week.
You see me listening right here.
Um, Marcus Lucas was a tight end for ST Louis last week. 4600.
But these guys pretty much ran his wide receivers.
Shawn Price was a Dallas tight end.
Not really any interest in him.
Carrie Lee had the touchdown, so there's tight ends on each team.
Houston's the only team without a tight end.
Do you like playing more players on Sunday and waiting? I'm not doing it because it's on Sunday.
That's a fine strategy.
Um, I'm just getting more players because the teams on Sunday or better, in my opinion, in the games or more appealing.
Sally, you're more of a cash game player.
I used to be, but in my opinion, cash games are not what they used to be.
You can still have an edge in some sports like XFL.
Yes, caches is probably the best format you could be playing unless you're 150.
Maxing the big contests XFL.
There's there's a lot of edges right now in cash early on.
Still, but MBA by all accounts, my opinion.
Cash angel like, solved.
I think they are in an MBA.
You're winning based on if you could pate fate, ownership in GPS and fade the right ownership and have that algorithm max out to the best.
Um, but yeah, like NFL moving forward, I'm probably gonna be much of a cash player. MLB.
There's no reason, in my opinion, to be playing cash unless you're just trying to have more exposure for some sort of bankroll reasons.
But I don't think there's much of a reason in playing it that much.
And I will be, um, XFL in WNBA.
I think Cashman's will find them.
I used to be a big cash player 34 years ago, but the amount of content out there right now in the amount of tools that you could use cash games.
Everybody knows the best MBA plays of the night locks of insulin lineups, and you're pretty much playing people to veto.
And that sounds like a terrible idea.
What is your most common entry fee? I play everything.
I'll play $1 single entries.
I'll play 200 in $222 single entries.
I'll play $100 single entry.
I don't play anything in the $1000 range yet just because I don't think those are good contest.
Long term for anybody.
Um, anything that starts to go like above 20 or $50 is much harder to profit in, um, long term in like large field GP peas.
But I stick this Englander three. Max.
I don't know my my average entry fee.
I haven't done those calculations.
I don't really care too much like, I'll build one line up that I really like a lot 3 to 5 lines for three Max play some 20 max.
Um, and that lineup will go into everything from the quarter contests and single entries.
And long as I could play those songs to stay below the $1 million entry fee limit and then they'll go up Thio, however, of confident I feel in that lineup, I'll play the 5 55 single entry some nights.
Um, probably the 7 77 single entries and MBA some nights if they are single insure that night.
But yeah, i'll play $100 usually every single time.
Yeah, I don't know where that averages out for you.
There's a good question, random questions out.
But it's fitting, since it's tax season insurers.
I've been talking to my accountant exchanging all my paperwork yesterday from my Elsie.
But do you have to pay taxes on gambling slash GFs winnings? Yes, you do.
If you win more than $600 just like any other I believe they send you, they send it to you.
You can obviously request it.
They were not sending, and yet I haven't seen anything.
I haven't gotten anything yet.
Um, you have to pay taxes.
It's you're you're making money.
You have to pay if.
And this is a company that's going to send your paperwork so it's easily going to be tracked by the IRS.
So you better pay taxes on any of your gambling wins.
I think you can make gambling losses.
Last week, we had this question brought up, and I think the right office, if you're a business expense, I don't know, I don't know exactly, Um, not the person that's about the right off part, but yeah.
Do you go more GPS or cash? In which bring more profitable cash games have become less profitable over the years because of more information.
More tools? Um, GPS are hard to profit in because you need one bank and then you go cold for 1 to 2 months.
My biggest profit, like money.
Why is the GPS? Because the upside of winning 16,000 like it did earlier this year, you're not gonna have that in cash.
Y, from winning cash is just going to be more stable.
It's just going to be lower amounts.
In my opinion, you'll get a 10 99.
Yeah, misleading a strained tendon. You. I miss you.
Why is there a Sunday? Only XFL, but not a Saturday.
Only I think they just they the the idea to have a Sunday on the ex felon out of Saturday's.
Because if you have a Saturday only XFL, it's going to take more money.
People are gonna put into that and not feel your large tournament.
They want the large tournament to fill, so they're not gonna put anymore contest that stop that from happening.
Have you played MLB cash games? Yes, I have before.
I don't think they're that great honestly.
I mean, you're banking on home runs and obviously pitching performances.
You wait pictures more in the MLB cash games, but the end of the day you're banking on home runs, and I'd rather just do that in stacks and tournaments.
Any interest in NASCAR knives? I've never even watched a single lap, I guess, of NASCAR.
I don't have anything bad to say about the score, just not my thing.
The case said that they will send their tax payment in full by the end of February.
Yeah, I saw somebody else, though said that they saw they're not going to get there.
Still march, Um, so some people are having trouble with that. All right, game.
I'm gonna balance.
It's been about an hour, but hit the subscribe one before you leave.
Hit the notification bell.
If you haven't done that yet for any reason, helps me out for sure.
Totally free to do so.
I'll post on patron.
Any injury updates how that affects the tears.
Answer questions and discord up until lock.
We got less than three hours. Not pretty exciting stuff.
Um, I chopped first in an NFL showdown this year, Expected tax do***ents, D K said they didn't have any tax do***ents for me.
Dave Carroll, If you say I don't know how much you want by chopping first, If it was, like 4000 I mean, it was like, 50,000.
Yeah, you should be taxed.
But it was, like, 4000.
But you've lost, like, 5000 before that.
Not saying you have.
But that's why it's how much you profited from the site.
I'm gonna bounce.
You have any questions? Reach out to me on Twitter for me at sa***e defense, we kept me over on this score.
That's where I'll be prioritizing the questions I had to subscribe and all that stuff signed up.
Why not support me over there? If you would like to see the tears in rankings for today, We just had braid and signed up.
I'm assuming that he saw this over on sports are YouTube.
So appreciate that I'll get to your question over on patriot now, Joshua.
Thank you. Thank you. Weak to the XFL.
That's the look, everybody today hopefully the ratings don't drop off that much.
I want these 100 k. Price goes to first.
You'll rock piece out. See later.